Editorial Guidelines
How Kingdom evaluates wellness products and builds review pages.
These guidelines explain how we compare products, when we use outbound source links, and what readers should assume about medical review, brand relationships, and page updates.
No paid-placement policy
Kingdom public reviews are free editorial resources. We do not accept commissions, referral fees, or paid ranking fees for the products we cover.
Medical review policy
Our content is educational. Unless a named reviewer is explicitly listed on a page, readers should not assume physician or clinician review.
Review workflow
01
Category framing
We define what a page is comparing, who it is for, and which shopper questions it should actually answer.
02
Brand and label review
We look at labels, ingredient transparency, dosing clarity, and whether the claims a reader will see are specific or vague.
03
Evidence scan
We review publicly available research, safety context, and the confidence level behind the claims being discussed.
04
Value comparison
Pricing, serving count, subscription structure, and product positioning are compared side by side when they materially affect the reader decision.
05
Independence check
We check that rankings are not being shaped by commissions, referral fees, paid placement, or brand requests.
06
Ongoing updates
We refresh pages when a product changes materially, when a recommendation becomes outdated, or when a factual issue is reported by readers.
What we evaluate
- Ingredient quality and formula logic
- Clarity of labeling and brand transparency
- Price relative to serving size and positioning
- Evidence support for the type of claim being made
- Reader usefulness: whether the page actually helps compare options
What we will not do
- Sell rankings, placement, or review outcomes to brands.
- Promise cures, medical outcomes, or unsupported timelines.
- Invent clinician review where none exists.
- Leave materially outdated recommendations live without review.